Updated Mar 22, 2026 • ~7 min read
Chapter 5: Growing Up Here
WILLA
The cliff path positions were not what she’d expected.
She’d expected the standard observation points that the survey protocol package had mapped: three documented positions at increasing elevation, all on the accessible headland side, giving coverage of the east and south-facing cliff sections. What Finn showed her was those three positions plus four others that weren’t in any documentation she’d been given — a ledge at the north-east corner that looked directly onto a section of the cliff face invisible from the cottage, a point above the south bay that let you look down into the nesting section, a flat rock formation halfway up the outer headland with sightlines in three directions.
She said: “These aren’t in the survey protocol documentation.”
He said: “They’re not accessible to all researchers. Some of them require a bit of scramble.”
She looked at the scramble — maybe ten feet of rough cliff path, nothing technical — and then at him.
He said: “The previous researchers didn’t have the equipment for it.”
She looked at her waterproof layers and her field pack.
She said: “I have the equipment.”
He said: “I can see that.”
She wrote down the coordinates for all four positions and photographed the sightlines.
But that wasn’t what occupied most of her notebook from the afternoon.
What occupied her notebook was what Finn Ashwood knew about the eagles.
It started at the second position — the south bay overlook, looking down into the nesting section — where she was running her count methodology and he said, without looking up from the cliff face: “The female on nest three has been on that site for nine years. She uses the same nest structure with modifications — she adds to the interior lining in alternating years.”
She stopped writing and looked at him.
He said: “Alternating years correlates with the prey availability cycle. When the fall run is good she lines the nest more heavily. Seven of the nine years have been good falls.”
She said: “How do you know that?”
He said: “Growing up here.”
She wrote it down. She wrote: *individual nest history, nine-year record, prey cycle correlation*. Then she wrote: *how does he have this*.
She kept asking questions.
He knew the individual identification markers for seventeen of the adults in the cliff population — wing patterning, size differentials, flight characteristics. He knew which nesting pairs had been stable for multiple seasons, which had reformed after a mortality event, and he mentioned the mortality events so casually that she almost missed the implication until she asked for clarification.
She said: “You said ‘mortality event’ for the adult male on the north face site — when was that?”
He said: “Twelve years ago. The female re-paired the following season.”
She said: “The federal database shows no mortality records for this population.”
He was quiet for a moment.
He said: “The database runs from the survey designation period. The mortality event was prior to the survey designation being applied to this site.”
She said: “The survey designation was —”
He said: “Sixteen years ago.”
She worked the timeline in her head. Twelve years ago was within the survey period. By four years.
She said: “The event was twelve years ago.”
He said: “The male died and the female re-paired. Isn’t that what you see in the database? A stable breeding pair on the north face site.”
She looked at her notes. The north face site showed a stable breeding pair with six years of continuous records — the duration of the monitoring program’s active data. Before that, the records were summary population counts.
She said: “The detailed individual records only go back six years.”
He said: “That’s when the monitoring program upgraded its methodology.”
She said: “Twelve years ago falls outside the detailed records.”
He said: “Yes.”
She looked at him.
He was looking at the cliff face with the composed attention he brought to everything. He had answered all her questions. Every answer had been accurate — she had enough background knowledge to assess that. And yet the accumulation of accurate answers was producing a picture that did not resolve.
She said: “Where did you learn the individual identification characteristics for seventeen birds?”
He said: “Growing up here. The community has always paid attention to the cliff population.”
She said: “You have individual nest histories going back nine years. You have prey cycle correlations. You have behavioral data that isn’t in any published literature.”
He looked at her.
She said: “Where did you learn about the alternating-year nest lining.”
He said: “From my father.”
She said: “Was he a biologist?”
He said: “He was from here.” He paused. “We pay attention to the things that live on these cliffs. It’s been true for a long time.”
She wrote: *community-based long-term observation, multi-generational. Father’s data. How far back does it go.*
She said: “How far back does the community’s observation record go?”
He said: “A while.”
She said: “That’s not a number.”
He almost smiled.
He said: “A long while. I’ll see if there’s anything I can share.”
She said: “I would be very interested in anything you can share.”
She meant it as a professional statement and then noticed from the quality of his stillness that it had landed differently. She noted that it had landed differently and went back to her count.
She got thirty-nine from the south bay position. Two more than the cottage count. She still needed the outer face.
She said: “Thursday. The boat access.”
He said: “If the forecast holds.”
She said: “It will hold.”
He said: “I’ll check the morning of.”
She wrote: *39 from south bay position. + 2 from cottage (37). Running total: 39 with possible overlap. Outer face essential.*
She wrote: *He has generational observation data. He offered it and then qualified it.*
She wrote: *I’ll see if there’s anything I can share.*
She wrote: *He has something he’s deciding about.*
She looked at the cliff face — the nesting section, the nine-year female on nest three making an adjustment to the interior lining with the focused efficiency that distinguished individuals who knew exactly what they were doing — and thought about a man who had grown up watching this cliff face until he knew it individual by individual, nest by nest, year by year.
She thought: *there’s more than he’s telling me.*
She thought: *he knows that I know there’s more than he’s telling me.*
She thought: *I would like to see the community observation records.*
She thought: *I would like to know how far back a long while is.*
She wrote: *Ask about the community records. Ask about the father’s data. Come back to the prey cycle correlations.*
She wrote: *Thursday.*
The October light was going flat and the cliff was doing what it did at the end of a clear day — going gold and copper and briefly extraordinary. She looked at it with the specific satisfaction of someone who had been productive and was not yet finished.
He looked at it with the quality of someone who had been looking at this exact view his whole life and had not yet run out of ways to see it.
She thought: *I should ask him more questions.*
She thought: *I have enough for today.*
She thought: *I’ll have more tomorrow.*
Reader Reactions