Updated Mar 23, 2026 • ~6 min read
Chapter 24: The question of precedent
KEN
She argued with Riko about precedent.
Not in the council meeting — the council meeting had gone well, which was the accurate description, and what that description concealed was that the word *well* in this context meant *better than any bond sanction proceeding in the council’s recent history*, which Yuki had confirmed with the particular satisfaction of someone whose assessment of a situation had been completely vindicated.
The argument happened two weeks later, when Riko came to the Yanaka shrine.
This was itself unusual. Riko did not often leave Kyoto for purposes other than formal council business. She appeared at the Yanaka shrine on a Saturday morning with the explanation that she had business in the district, which Ken understood to mean she’d invented business in the district, and she sat in the inner courtyard and drank tea and looked at the cedar tree with the expression she reserved for things that had been around for longer than most other things.
Emiko was in the archive, which she always was on Saturday mornings. She came out when she heard Riko at the gate — she had good territorial awareness, which was developing faster than Ken had expected — and she looked at Riko with the expression that meant she was updating the mental catalogue.
She said: “You’re Riko.”
Riko said: “You’ve seen me before.”
Emiko said: “In the council meeting. You look different in the shrine context.” She sat down with her tea. She said: “I have a question about the 1680 account’s third section. The version you sent. The human partner refers to a council precedent that Ken told me doesn’t exist in the documented record.”
Riko said: “Which precedent?”
Emiko said: “The Muromachi-period case. The human partner cites it as the basis for the longevity terms she negotiated. But the documented Muromachi-period case is the Kyoto account, which is categorically different—”
Riko said: “The Muromachi-period case she’s citing is not the Kyoto account.”
Emiko said: “I know. That’s what I said.”
Riko said: “There’s a second Muromachi-period case.”
Emiko said: “The documented record only shows one.”
Riko said: “The documented record is incomplete.”
Emiko said: “What’s in the undocumented record?”
Riko looked at her. Ken watched this exchange from the edge of the courtyard with the warm quality that he’d been learning to let be what it was, which was the particular feeling of watching someone you knew well do the thing they did that made the world better. She had the notebook out. She was asking Riko about the second Muromachi-period case as though it were a standard research question, which meant she was asking with the full weight of her professional competence and her three-years-of-fieldwork focus.
Riko, to Ken’s observation, was dealing with the experience of being cross-examined by someone who had better citation practice than most of the council’s members.
She said, to Emiko: “The second Muromachi case is in the council’s private archive. It was sealed in the nineteenth century.”
Emiko said: “On what basis?”
Riko said: “The human partner requested it.”
Emiko said: “Why?”
Riko said: “She had reasons.”
Emiko said: “What were they?”
Riko said: “I don’t recall precisely.”
Ken noted that Riko’s expression had shifted into the one that meant she was being challenged in a way she found unexpectedly difficult.
Emiko said: “The 1680 human partner cited the second Muromachi case as precedent for negotiated longevity terms. If the case is sealed, the precedent is unavailable to later partners, which means the negotiation she made — and presumably others like it — was based on material that subsequent partners couldn’t access.” She paused. “That seems like a problem with the council’s documentation practice.”
Riko said: “The sealing was at the partner’s request.”
Emiko said: “I understand that. I’m questioning whether a request from the nineteenth century should continue to govern access in the present century, particularly when the precedent in question is directly relevant to bonds being sanctioned today.” She looked at Riko steadily. “I’m not arguing for unlimited access. I’m arguing that the material’s relevance to current proceedings should be assessed against the terms of the sealing.”
A silence.
Riko said: “You’re suggesting a review of the nineteenth-century sealing conditions.”
Emiko said: “Yes. Through whatever process the council uses for such reviews.”
Riko said: “There is a process.”
Emiko said: “Would you describe it?”
Ken watched Riko describe the council’s review process for sealed materials. He watched her do it with the specific quality of someone who had been asked something reasonable and was responding reasonably, and who was also becoming aware that the thing she’d been doing — sending the full 1680 account, coming to Yanaka, engaging this particular human on her own terms — was producing a conversation she hadn’t anticipated and was finding, he thought, interesting.
When Riko finished, Emiko said: “That’s a three-month process.”
Riko said: “At minimum.”
Emiko said: “I’d like to submit a formal request.”
Riko said: “I’ll send you the forms.”
Emiko said: “Thank you.”
Riko said: “You cite three cases in the first argument. Two of those cases are misattributed in the academic literature.”
Emiko said: “I know. The third one is the Fushimi account, which is correctly attributed but incompletely translated.” She paused. “The correct translation changes the reading significantly.”
Riko said: “What does the correct translation say?”
Emiko said: “That the human partner had opinions about the council’s documentation practices.”
Riko looked at her for a long moment.
Then she said — and Ken had heard this tone from Riko approximately four times in the course of his relationship with the council, always preceding an acknowledgment she found difficult — “The second Muromachi account describes a human partner who submitted seventeen questions to the council in her first month.”
Emiko said: “What happened?”
Riko said: “Eleven of them resulted in council policy changes.” She paused. “The remaining six are still being discussed.”
Emiko looked at her notebook. She wrote something. She said: “What’s the current status of the sixth?”
Riko said: “Unresolved.”
Emiko said: “Can I see the documentation?”
Riko said, with the expression that meant she was going to say yes and was deciding how to say it: “I’ll have it sent.”
Ken looked at the cedar tree. He looked at Emiko. He looked at Riko.
Riko, without looking at him, said: “She’s good.”
He said: “I know.”
Riko said: “She was going to get here eventually.”
He said: “I know that too.”
Riko said: “I’ll send the forms.” She stood. “Same time next month, Miss Tanaka. There are four other sealed cases whose review conditions may be relevant to your research.”
Emiko said: “I’ll have questions about those as well.”
“I assumed,” Riko said, and she left through the gate, and the Yanaka morning was warm, and from the cedar tree’s corner of the courtyard the quality of the light was the warmest it had been in three centuries.
Reader Reactions